exhibit5-1.htm

We have acted as counsel to Amtech Systems, Inc., an Arizona corporation (the “Corporation”), in connection with a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the “Registration Statement”) filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) relating to the proposed sale by the Corporation from time to time, in one or more series, of (i) its debt securities, which may be either senior notes (the “Senior Notes “), subordinated notes (the “Subordinated Notes,” together with the Senior Notes, the “Debt Securities”); (ii) shares of its preferred stock (the “Preferred Stock”); (iii) shares of its common stock (the “Common Stock”); (iv) warrants to purchase Debt Securities (the “Debt Warrants”) to be issued pursuant to a warrant agreement between the Corporation and a designated warrant agent (a “Debt Securities Warrant Agreement”); (v) warrants to purchase equity securities of the Corporation (the “Equity Warrants”) pursuant to a warrant agreement between the Corporation and a designated warrant agent (an “Equity Securities Warrant Agreement”); and (vi) units consisting of two or more securities, in any combination (the “Units”).

The Debt Securities, Preferred Stock, Common Stock, Debt Warrants, Equity Warrants and Units are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Securities.” The Securities may be issued and sold or delivered from time to time as set forth in the Registration Statement, any amendment thereto, the prospectus contained therein (the “Prospectus”) and any supplements thereto.

We have examined such documents, including the resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted on September 30, 2010 (the “Resolutions”), and have reviewed such questions of law, as we have considered necessary and appropriate for the purposes of our opinion set forth below. In rendering our opinions set forth below, we have assumed the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the genuineness of all signatures and the conformity to authentic originals of all documents submitted to us as copies.

We have also assumed the legal capacity for all purposes relevant hereto of all natural persons and, with respect to all parties to agreements or instruments relevant hereto other than the Corporation, that such parties had the requisite power and authority (corporate or otherwise) to execute, deliver and perform such agreements or instruments, that such agreements or instruments have been duly authorized by all requisite action (corporate or otherwise), executed and delivered by such parties and that such agreements or instruments are the valid, binding and enforceable obligations of such parties. As to questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon certificates of officers of the Corporation and of public officials. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in each form incorporated by reference as exhibits to the Registration Statement.

1. When the specific terms of a series of Debt Securities have been specified in a Supplemental Indenture or an Officer’s Certificate, which has been executed and delivered to the trustee by an authorized officer of the Company (an “Authorized Officer”), such series of Debt Securities will have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and, when executed and authenticated as specified in the Indentures and delivered against payment therefore and as specified by an Authorized Officer, or when issued upon valid exercise of Debt Warrants that have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and validly issued, will constitute valid and binding obligations of the Corporation, enforceable in accordance with the terms of such series.

2. When the specific terms of a series of Preferred Stock have been specified in a Certificate of Designation duly adopted by the Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee thereof, and such Certificate of Designation has been duly filed with the Arizona Corporations Commission, such series of Preferred Stock will have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and, upon issuance, delivery and payment therefore as may be described in a supplement to the Prospectus, or when issued upon valid exercise of Equity Warrants that have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and validly issued, shares of such series of Preferred Stock will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

3. Upon issuance, delivery and payment therefore as may be described in a supplement to the Prospectus, or when issued upon valid exercise of Equity Warrants that have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and validly issued, shares of Common Stock will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

4. When the specific terms of a series of Debt Warrants have been specified in a Debt Securities Warrant Agreement, the Debt Warrants established in such Debt Securities Warrant Agreement will have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and, when executed and authenticated as specified in such Debt Securities Warrant Agreement and delivered against payment therefore pursuant to any terms that may be described in a supplement to the Prospectus, will constitute valid and binding obligations of the Corporation, enforceable in accordance with the terms of such Debt Warrants.

5. When the specific terms of a series of Equity Warrants have been specified in an Equity Securities Warrant Agreement, the Equity Warrants established in such Equity Securities Warrant Agreement will have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and, when executed and authenticated as specified in such Warrant Agreement and delivered against payment therefore pursuant to the terms described in a supplement to the Prospectus, will constitute valid and binding obligations of the Corporation, enforceable in accordance with the terms of such Equity Warrants.

(a) Our opinions in paragraphs 1, 4 and 5, above are subject to (i) the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar law of general application affecting creditors’ rights, (ii) the effect of general principles of equity, including (without limitation) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing, and other similar doctrines affecting the enforceability of agreements generally (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law), and (iii) insofar as they relate to indemnification provisions, the effect of federal and state securities laws and public policy relating thereto.

(b) In rendering the opinions set forth above, we have assumed that, at the time of the authentication and delivery of a series of Securities, the Resolutions referred to above will not have been modified or rescinded, there will not have occurred any change in the law affecting the authorization, execution, delivery, validity or enforceability of the Securities, the Registration Statement will have been declared effective by the Commission and will continue to be effective, none of the particular terms of a series of Securities will violate any applicable law and neither the issuance and sale thereof nor the compliance by the Corporation with the terms thereof will result in a violation of any agreement or instrument then binding upon the Corporation or any order of any court or governmental body having jurisdiction over the Corporation.

(c) As of the date of this opinion, a judgment for money in an action based on a debt security denominated in a foreign currency or currency unit in a federal or State court in the United States ordinarily would be enforced in the United States only in United States dollars. The date used to determine the rate of conversion into United States dollars of the foreign currency or currency unit in which a particular debt security is denominated will depend upon various factors, including which court renders the judgment. Under Section 27 of the New York Judiciary Law, a state court in the State of New York rendering a judgment on a debt security would be required to render such judgment in the foreign currency or currency unit in which such debt security is denominated, and such judgment would be converted into United States dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of entry of the judgment.

	/s/Squire Sanders and Dempsey (US) LLP
	Squire Sanders and Dempsey (US) LLP